This presentation was part of the symposium Unhanded. In this panel we ask about the variety of new relationships with materials that emerging with the increasing ubiquitousness of digital technologies. With the increased complexity of tools we wonder how do we learn about materials? How do we get to know them? How do we share this knowledge? We can now know the molecular structure of wood or metal without touching it. Is this a more intimate relationship than working directly with our hands? Does it matter? If the objects coming out of digital and mechanical processes are more removed from our handywork, how might they carry the mark of the machine? Should we be able to read the machine in the material?
Tom Bessai, BA, BArch, MArch, OAA, MRAIC
Tom Bessai is a registered architect and an Assistant Professor at the Daniels FALD. He holds an MArch from UCLA and is completing a MSc from the University of Michigan’s Taubman College with a specialization in Design and Material Systems. His research and teaching explore computation and digital fabrication strategies for adaptive architecture. His essay, Ideal Models Vs. Hybrid Models will appear in the forthcoming publication, Paradigms in Computing: Making, Machines, and Models for Design Agency in Architecture, to correspond with the ACADIA 2014 conference, Los Angeles. Denegri Bessai Studio Architecture was established by partners Maria Denegri and Tom Bessai in 2008. Work from the office has won numerous design awards, and has appeared in a range of local and international publications. They have recently established DBS Fabrication, an on-site research and production lab. It greatly enhances the computing and prototyping facilities of the practice, and supplements teaching and research.
Redundancy has become a really important kind of thing that people are looking for in this design world. How do we create systems that are playful, that overlap in various ways?
How do you turn our attention that has a collection of small maker spaces into something that actually has larger spaces, etc., that can leverage a broader audience and a larger spectrum of work. So what are these? What are the kind of what’s the DG fab ecosystem item, let’s call it starting to look like. So let’s just have a quick look at that at some of these ideas. Ideal projects really there is in that in terms of the terminology coming from architects, there was always geometry, order and meaning and many of us on the kind of architecture and the academic architecture side can spend years unpacking these. Roger Connor would be able to speak to this for probably a marathon session of 48 hours of just talking about these topics. So there they are and they remain at a kind of foundational level in this discussion. Next, other ideas, though, have started to kind of permeate notions of local response and minimum use of energy. Those that are interested in building science have been talking about these things. But really there’s another dimension to this that’s about the experience. So how do we start to make less generic spaces and more particular spaces? These are tending to be done through the lens of technology, performance versus behavior. We as architects, we deal a lot with engineers and we are always engineers are very kind of quick to discuss the performance of buildings, the performance of the spaces that we occupy. I’m exploring a broader term that I think is more useful in the context of this kind of the sort of the unknown qualities that are currently in our design making design fabrication kind of syntax, which would be behavior, not how we behave in buildings rather, but but not nor how the buildings kind of in an empirical sense perform, but rather this relationship between, let’s say, people, technology, space, a set of ideas, a performance. How are those kind of behaviors important? And finally, a couple of other comments. Redundancy has become a really important kind of thing that people are looking for in this design world. How do we create systems that are playful, that overlap in various ways? And finally, hybridization and interaction terms that I think are really will become very essential in the kind of syntax or lexicon of discussions around design and technology.
Famous New Media Artist Jeremy Bailey helped shape the structure of the Digital Economies Lab and here we discuss their vision for artistic prosperity in the 21st century. We chat about artists’ complicated relationship to capital and how we are in an exciting moment of transformation. Join us, as we delve into questions of value, the pace of production, and our perception of reality, augmented or not.
An engaging panel with Kristin Anne Carlson, Davide Rokeby and Chris Salter, moderated by Nell Tenhaff which delves into different relationships artists are cultivating with machines.
This discussion brings together artist, scholar and Director of Creating Knowing and Sharing: The Arts and Cultures of First Nations at the Canada Council for the Arts, Steven Loft; craft historian Sandra Alfoldy; architect Tom Bessai; and fashion designer, Valerie Lamontagne, to consider the way we talk about making.