What does it mean to speak of “aural culture?” What does listening offer, as a tool or technique for understanding our world, that visual perception cannot? The sounds that fill our lives are dense with information about the interwoven cultures to which we belong, and approaches to their investigation can take similarly varied routes. For Linda-Ruth Salter, language is a primary element of culture. Expressed aloud it is a richly coded meaning system, but it can also speak volumes when forced into silence. In Brendan Fernandes’ work, these aural codes are explored as forms of communication that have the capacity to build and sustain community, on one hand, but also as generators of difference that produce cultural gaps and social boundaries. In his creative process, Fernandes is constantly adapting to specific geographic places through sound. For the architect David Lieberman, however, the question “may not be [one of] listening to words,” but something closer to an aural tactility, in which spaces have the potential to embrace their human occupants, intellectually and physically. All panelists agreed on the political power of sound – that it intersects almost every aspect of our lives, and is part of larger mechanisms such as military systems, advertising, music, protests, and silence. Through an interdisciplinary approach, this panel asked, “How do the cultures we live in affect an understanding of sound and, vice-versa, how does sound shape culture?”
DIPNA HORRA is a multidisciplinary artist, architect, and educator living in Ottawa, Canada. She is a PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture & Urbanism at Carleton University and has received a Master of Fine Arts from Ottawa University. Horra has been an educator in the field of architecture and new media in New York and Canada. She has exhibited her art in numerous solo and group exhibitions nationally and internationally in Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, New York City, Brooklyn, Berlin, London, and Dubai. Recent audio installations, such as Avaaz and Dhunia have addressed hybrid identity and transcultural synthesis with technology. These sound studies, questioning displacement and migration, are intersections in architecture, sculpture and cultural geography. Horra’s recent ephemeral spaces were created with autobiographical narrative, field recording, micro broadcasting, as well as hand made microphones and speakers.
The heart of the conference involves four separate discussions on the relationship of sound and space to be led by four artists/researchers; bringing together creative thinkers from Montréal, Toronto, New York City, San Francisco, and of course right here in Ottawa. Planned as dynamic free flow conversations, we are excited about what ideas will unfold from these exchanges! Building up to the major discussion panels is a keynote address from Dr. Barry Blesser, a digital audio pioneer and co-author of the fascinating interdisciplinary exploration – Spaces Speak: Are you listening? On Friday, a daytime symposium with the Carleton School of Architecture will explore specific ideas about the built environment and the sonic experience, while at night a collaboration with Pecha Kucha Ottawa brings together artists, designer and researchers for a rapid fire exploration of the role of sound in the urban fabric.
The voice plays an important role in this liberation, as does silence, along with the cultural and physical spaces within which these will resound.
This question has been developing in my own sonic practice at the intersection of art, architecture, and cultural studies. I often work with autobiographical ideas and everyday gestures. I am Hindu, Punjabi and I was born in Nairobi, Kenya. I moved to the suburbs of Ottawa at the age of two and I have lived in Canada for most of my life. Embedded in my psyche are oral stories that my elders have retold to me over the years. My interest in storytelling is combined with a background in architecture and media installations. Areas of primary investigation in my practice have always been space, time, and migration, as they relate to cultural identity. I am particularly drawn to the way that architectural elements can be used to speak of deeper cultural and social contexts.
My combined cultures have led me, in my practice, to explore the in-between space that incorporates both of these places. In The Location of Culture, Homi K. Bhabha calls this temporal passage a “Third Space.” In this space, Bhabha says, “the enunciation of marginal voices displaces the narrative of the Western nation.” The Third Space is made up of an ambivalence that challenges the Western historical identity of culture as a homogenizing, unifying force.” For Bhabha, this Third Space is an unhomely space where marginalized communities become visible agents within conditions of intimacy.
Bhabha’s concept of the unhomely is a reworking of Sigmund Freud’s idea of the uncanny, from a postcolonial perspective. One of the first written discussions of the uncanny, by Ernst Jentsch in his 1906 essay On the Psychology of the Uncanny, describes a scenario defined by “doubt as to whether an apparently living being is animate and, conversely, doubt as to whether a lifeless object may not in fact be animate.” Freud elaborated on this concept in his 1919 essay The Uncanny, specifically discussing the translation of “the uncanny” from the German expression “das unheimliche,” which literally means un-homely. The unhomely moment describes an instant where something can be known, yet is simultaneously strange. The effect hinges on a sense of alienation and displacement. In my experience, the unhomely space is a liminal one between native and adopted cultures.
Dhunia – Windows of the World is a series of sculptural audio installations and videos that I began creating in 2010. The first of these works, Dhunia: Part One, was exhibited in Canada at the Surrey Art Gallery in British Columbia in 2011. The second in this series, Dhunia: Part Two, was exhibited at Pink Gallery in Berlin in 2011, and the third iteration was presented as Dhunia: Septet at A Space Gallery in Toronto in 2012. These pieces related a desire to make visible the unhomely moment in what Bhabha calls the “ordinariness” of the quotidian. My works explored cultural hybridity through Bhabha’s discussion of the performative agency of minority identities in the peculiar temporality of the Third Space. In my practice, I have questioned how to make uncanny spaces through sound projects that work with notions of dislocation and translation. In part, Dhunia‘s spaces expressed forgetting and the loss of my mother tongue, Punjabi, while simultaneously constructing a present space that investigated translations in my first language, English.
Dhunia anthropomorphized seemingly static objects, mysteriously transforming an old vanity and weathered storm windows into speaker diaphragms. These embodied elements reverberated with age-old sayings and the sounds of the everyday, conveying uncanny qualities of active, invisible presences. In this series, found objects were transformed into audio speakers that performed as a musical ensemble: individually tuned instruments that spoke of transcultures and hybrid identities found in domestic spaces. Dhunia investigates a synthesis of regional building elements, traditional oral storytelling, and translations of languages. The artistic intent was to create an interactive experience with tactile sounds that were transduced through an installation of hybrid sonic sculptures. This transduction gave agency to Grandmother’s and Grandaughter’s tongues. These installations contemplated translations of native cultures and languages due to dislocation, exile and migration.
My art practice reflects a mixing of Eastern and Western aural-cultural influences. I am intrigued by the way that languages, as primary tools of oral storytelling, can convey hybridity. In my installations of Dhunia, I wanted to use language to give the listener a sensation of misplacement in an environment. I wanted this use of language to contribute to the production of an unhomely space. This space combined voice, sound and movement to convey invisible presences and physical experiences. In Dhunia, I recalled the home without the physical framework of a house. I produced sequences of autobiographical sound fragments that performed in compositions of audio installations and video images. This practice was led by an examination of myth and migration as they related to cultural identity.
In my recent installations I have used ancestral narratives as criteria for self-evaluation and self-discovery, through a questioning of cultural identity as it relates to experiences of home. These queries drew on Homi Bhabha’s theories of the “in-between, Third Space … an interstitial future.” For Bhabha, this future “makes available to marginalized or minority identities a mode of performative agency.” The construction of Dhunia – Windows of the World explored the figurative boundaries of unhomely spaces. Narrative fragments were shared at these sites, giving form to ideas of transcultural hybridity. Dhunia examined the performative agency of sonic spaces of dislocation and reflection. In these installations, cultural translations and intimate familial communications unfolded spaces for future memories to be framed within the tradition of my Grandmother’s oral storytelling.
My vocabulary relates to cultural displacements and psychological breaks from comforting notions of home and family. Personal dislocation and societal detachment are a part of my experience of living in Canada. My practice revolves around questions of exile and hegemonic sonic structures that influence the production of cultural spaces. How does aural culture act as a transmission device – translating knowledges of transnational and transitional spaces? Bhabha writes about the positions of certain groups of people, located in the margins of colonial cultures. Within these marginalized situations, people hold layered and often contradictory ties to their other cultures. Bhabha provokes the question of how one uses a location in the margin as an empowering tool and how people can strengthen themselves through otherness. The voice plays an important role in this liberation, as does silence, along with the cultural and physical spaces within which these will resound.
Developed in our Digital Economies Lab, An Artist’s Almanac is Suzanne Kite’s dive into artist solidarity through exchange and sharing. Kite discussed how she began from the DEL’s central focus on fostering artistic prosperity, and expanded toward questions about whether existing resources are going where they are needed most. Through her work on the project she builds a network of collaborators and fosters dreaming and imagining workshops as a path toward a better future.