Futures Imagined

In Conversation with Suzanne Kite

Developed in our Digital Economies Lab, An Artist's Almanac is Suzanne Kite's dive into artist solidarity through exchange and sharing. Kite discussed how she began from the DEL’s central focus on fostering artistic prosperity, and expanded toward questions about whether existing resources are going where they are needed most. Through her work on the project she builds a network of collaborators and fosters dreaming and imagining workshops as a path toward a better future.

“Stuff”

Produced by the Artengine Stream Team:

Mikke Gordon aka Seiiizi https://twitter.com/s3iiizi

Ryan Stec

Kimberly Sunstrum https://www.kmbrlysnstrm.com/

Editorial Assistant

Erin Galt

Production Design Consultation

Leslie Marshall/MAVNetwork http://mavnetwork.com/

Post-Production Support: Chris Ikonomopoulos

DEL Theme Music by Mikki Gordon aka Seiiizi

Artengine’s Digital Economies Lab brought together a diverse group of artists, designers and other creatives to rethink the infrastructure of cultural production in the 21st century.

Funding for the Digital Economies Lab was received through the Canada Council for the Arts Digital Strategies Fund.

This NFT Moment

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) made their way into the popular imagination and have been a lightning rod topic in the realm of culture throughout this year. As part of our Digital Economies Lab, we invited Famous New Media Artist Jeremy Bailey to help us consider this current moment and put it in a larger context of art, culture and technology. Check out the conversation as well as links and notes to help orient you or expand your considerations of this NFT moment.

GO HERE

Body Mind Machine

An engaging panel with Kristin Anne Carlson, Davide Rokeby and Chris Salter, moderated by Nell Tenhaff which delves into different relationships artists are cultivating with machines.

GO HERE

Caring + Sharing

Artengine’s Artistic Director Ryan Stec in conversation with Digital Economies Lab (DEL) participant, strategist, designer, artist and independent creative director, Julie Gendron, where they discuss Gendron’s work on the Offer Need Machine (ONM). Within this discussion Gendron addresses quantifying value by breaking down the mechanics of trust, recreating the ephemerality of chance interaction, and rating and evaluating with care.

GO HERE

Excerpts from the conversation

“Having the bison come back is a really specific vision and, actually, my vision is even smaller than that. I just want a multigenerational household that is healthy and functional. What a joy that would be?! What a gift, but that may not be possible for all of my relatives in this lifetime. There’s so many different types of needs and futures and they really change person-to-person, but hopefully they equal this some kind of whole.”

"I think that becomes clear when you ask people to really sit down and imagine a future where their needs are met. I ask people to go as far into the future as it takes for you to have those needs met. 10 years? 1,000 years? 10,000 years?"

Excerpt 1

Suzanne Kite

So we want to have ethical new knowledge, we want to make new things that do good things, but the way we’re doing it is in this specific way of doing things, but if I look at the way other traditions of making, other epistemological traditions, one of them is very clearly dreaming. 

You dream something and you know how to do it, and I know lots of different people who do lots of different ways of dreaming. My partner and his father, his father more so, he builds experimental airplanes and when he sleeps he solves problems. I don’t think this man rests, but he solves complete, difficult, impossible engineering problems in his sleep every night. 

It’s crazy, and my partner does that, too. Wakes up with the answer, and I’ve heard about that, but…There’s other forms that, I mean the traditional form.

So, in Lakȟóta culture, you really need to dream certain designs in order to make them. We have something called the Double Woman cult, where this woman, she’s a powerful figure who delivers you things that must be made.

You are absolutely, absolutely are committed. 

You have a responsibility to your dreams to create them, and that’s where I see Tricia Hersey’s NAP ministry is so inspiring. 

It’s really for Black folks to say, like, “You don’t have to work yourself to the bone, you can rest” and that’s what’s so inspiring.

And that’s why I think in the original DEL workshops, I was really drawn to this idea where I was like, “Oh, my communities, many communities that I know, don’t actually participate fully in capitalism.” They kind of pretend to participate in capitalism, and why is that? 

It’s because time to rest, time to dream, time to have visions, because the ways of doing the dream, having the dream, resting long enough so you can have a dream, is necessary in order to make something that’s never been made before.

Excerpt 2

Ryan Stec

Can you elaborate on some of those, even if they’re sort of fantastical in your mind, of the idea of what that structure might look like?

Suzanne Kite

It’s like there’s this issue between how much community consultation–how we talk to people–the more community consultation had to be done. So, one thing that people talked about was accessibility, grant cycles, ways to say, “This is who I am, what resources are out there for me?” 

Which, I think, Asinnajaq was the one who pointed that out that, 

“This is who I am. 

This is what I want to take care of. 

This is what I want in 10 years. 

How can I get there?”

We ended up thinking about different bubbles of care, things that we wanted to take care of. Of course, those bubbles of mental and physical health crossed but we still saw them as little clusters of information. The thing that we really wanted to explore is about, in design, how you can include circular time, nonlinear time, cyclical seasons, because that’s also how grant stuff works and how economies work. 

There is a cyclical nature to it and things don’t repeat necessarily, but seasons happen.

Ryan Stec

Yeah. The spiral: that things are going kind of around and repeating, but never quite covering the same space. That kind of endless spiral of time.

Suzanne Kite

Yeah.

Ryan Stec

The the role of technology in this, and it’s such a sort of broad and almost meaningless word, obviously, but here in the Lab as we brought people together, for us, one of the most interesting explorations that has been happening in the different projects is how the different creatives relate to the idea of ‘technology’ and how they want to position their work in relation to technology. It’s not that we thought when people came together, that we just expected them to be building bots, or whatever, but I think we noticed a real kind of resistance, a push against the idea of first producing, and I wonder how you think about that tension in this project, and maybe your practice more broadly, as well?

Suzanne Kite

Kind of the shifting definition of technology and actually making?

Ryan Stec

Yeah.

Suzanne Kite

I think what this project helped me articulate was that my definition of ‘technology’ is the way we do things. 

I won’t say methodology, but some very specific ‘technologies’. For example, Lakȟóta linguistics and what that does to time. In Lakȟóta linguistics, the very specific technology of the past-to-the-present are one tense, and that really radically transforms the way you make things, if the past and the present are simultaneous. 

I think what I learned from my colleagues were other technologies, like the technology of consultation where it was this constant loop. You would think it would be a given in a lot of spaces, but it’s not. 

It’s a really specific technology to be able to reach back to your community and figure out what they need.