#AGAlive | Online Screening and Talk with Anna Hawkins and Lindsey Sharman

2021

In this April 15 #AGAlive virtual event, artist Anna Hawkins shared her latest video work ‘Blue Light Blue’ (please note the preview has been removed from this video). Anna and curator Lindsey Sharman discuss the omnipresence of digital screens, the blue light they emit and Hawkins’ use of horror tropes in her work. ‘Anna Hawkins: Blue Light Blue’ is organized by the Art Gallery of Alberta, and curated by Lindsey Sharman. The RBC New Works Gallery features new artworks by Alberta artists and continues the Art Gallery of Alberta’s tradition of supporting and promoting Alberta artists.

#AGAlive is made possible with the support of the EPCOR Heart + Soul Fund and the Canada Council for the Arts.In this April 15 #AGAlive virtual event, artist Anna Hawkins shared her latest video work ‘Blue Light Blue’ (please note the preview has been removed from this video). Anna and curator Lindsey Sharman discuss the omnipresence of digital screens, the blue light they emit and Hawkins’ use of horror tropes in her work. ‘Anna Hawkins: Blue Light Blu …

Key moments

View all

Soundtrack
Soundtrack
28:26

Soundtrack

28:26

Inspiration for the Soundtrack
Inspiration for the Soundtrack
28:39

Inspiration for the Soundtrack

28:39

Motivation in Wanting a Full Screening of the Film
Motivation in Wanting a Full Screening of the Film
34:54

Motivation in Wanting a Full Screening of the Film

34:54

Autogenerated Transcript from YouTube (if available)

Use CTRL+F to find key words if it is a longer transcript​.

0:05

hi everyone um my name is uh lindsay sharman uh i’m the curator of the art gallery of

0:12

alberta i’m very happy to be introducing our event this evening

0:17

which is a screening of ana hawkins new film blue light blue and then a conversation with anna

0:24

and a look into her exhibition that’s at the aga anna’s exhibition also titled blue light

0:31

blue is up right now um at the art gallery of alberta and although we remain closed to the public

0:38

uh that exhibition will be ready uh whenever health restrictions allow us to open to the public

0:44

again um so anna hawkins works primarily in moving image and installation uh she has

0:51

completed a ba in art history at the university of pittsburgh and received an mfa from

0:56

concordia university and she’s currently assistant professor in fine art at mcewan university

1:04

anna i and the aga we’re all situated on treaty 6 territory

1:10

uh we are also in edmonton um and this and uh treaty six are a traditional

1:16

land of uh diverse indigenous peoples including uh cree uh blackfoot metis

1:23

nicotisou iroquois inuit and ojibwe solto anishinabe

1:30

i’d also like to acknowledge all of the indigenous inuit and metis people who make edmonton

1:36

and alberta their home today so this evening we are going to watch

1:41

anna’s film uh in its entirety uh so it’s about 15 minutes

1:46

after which um i have some questions for anna and if anyone watching has

1:52

uh any questions about uh the video or anna’s practice uh you can just put them in the chat at

1:58

any time i’ll be monitoring it throughout um so before i

2:03

invite uh anna to come introduce the film i’d like to thank epcor for their support our online

2:10

programming is brought to you because of the generous support of the epcor heart and soul

2:15

fund i’d also like to thank canada council for the arts for their

2:21

support of our online programming and anna’s exhibition is also in the rbc gallery at the aga

2:28

and was sponsored by rbc and so thank you to them for their ongoing support of

2:34

artists um so anna

2:39

would you like to join me and and set the stage for for your film for us hi hi

2:47

thanks lindsay hi thanks so much um yeah i just want to also um kind of reiterate that i’m also

2:53

joining today from treaty 6 territory and amazon skykin um and just thinking

2:59

in all of these um digital virtual events that were taking up so much of our time right now

3:05

it’s uh good to kind of think about where we are physically located and the history of that place um and also just really want to thank

3:12

you lindsay it’s been a real pleasure working on this exhibition with you and with the whole team at the aga um

3:18

i’ve really enjoyed working on this exhibition and hope that people will be able to see it fingers crossed um we’ll see um

3:24

so yeah before we watch the film i don’t want to say too much but just to kind of introduce it um it’s a work that um i started about

3:32

two years ago and um the production for it largely unfolded over two summers so the summer

3:38

of 2019 i shot a lot of it while um on a residency in sackville new brunswick

3:43

and then i continued working on it last summer in semi lockdown um here in edmonton

3:49

um and so the the theme of the work and sort of responding to blue light so

3:55

the type of light that is emanated from our screens and devices

4:01

i think since i’ve begun this project has become something that maybe people have become more aware of or are

4:07

thinking more about their exposure to this type of light and what that means and

4:13

uh though you’ll see in the work that um i’m kind of adopting a sort of um

4:19

reference to horror film and the horror genre and that came about um kind of from a previous work that i had done and

4:26

i knew that this was a genre that i wanted to explore and when i started working on this um

4:31

project i saw a lot of news pieces and kind of click bait headlines about blue light

4:36

and a lot of the stock imagery um really looked like stills from horror films so there would be

4:43

often female figures in a bed in a darkened room with this super

4:49

intense blue light emanating from a device so i kind of that’s where i started to

4:55

link these things together and um as the projects have progressed i um decided that i wanted to work with um 16

5:02

millimeter film as well as digital video um and so as you watch the work you’ll see that

5:07

um there are kind of two perspectives and maybe you could even see it as two different characters that are characterized by these two

5:14

different formats so um the film footage is often shot in a sort of pov

5:20

first person perspective and kind of a handheld manner and the video footage is often a more

5:26

objective camera um more stationary um although those rules are broken within

5:33

the work as well but there’s something to maybe think about in watching it um so i think maybe i’ll stop there and

5:40

hopefully we can talk a lot more after we watch the work sure thanks um yeah so there we go

5:48

thank you

5:59

amazing congrats thank you

6:06

um right um so i’d like

6:13

to show a little bit about what the installation looks like um so we have

6:19

some images here so this is you know when you first walk in um text panel and i guess

6:28

here’s a drawing that’s also in the space so in the exhibition there is this one

6:34

drawing um and the video and i think if i go one

6:39

more yes so here you can you can kind of see like a little bit of of what the full installation

6:46

looks like so the video is projected on the the back of this wall but the first thing that you see

6:51

when you come in this space here you’re sort of confronted with this drawing um and the

6:59

imagery of the lamppost is also something that kind of shows up throughout the film um so i wonder if

7:06

you could just share a little bit about um the significance of the lamp post

7:13

itself as like an image and also the the drawing sure um so this kind of um

7:21

bit of the film sort of emerged over this this past summer and as i was doing sort

7:26

of more research for the project and um thinking about the history of artificial lighting and

7:33

thinking about um so thinking about devices as light emitting rather than just sort of um

7:40

communication and conduits of information so thinking them as devices that essentially emit light um so

7:48

um in in sort of researching like histories of of artificial lighting which maybe this is obvious but i hadn’t

7:54

really connected the idea that um artificial lighting and lighting in public spaces has always been kind of

8:00

connected to ideas of surveillance and societal control and intervention by

8:07

governments so thinking about how people felt when even gaslighting when gas lines were

8:14

installed and into private homes it was a real um infiltration of uh of

8:20

um larger you know governmental forces coming into really intimate domestic spaces in a way that

8:27

um was quite uncomfortable i think for a lot of people so um thinking about that and think of the

8:32

lamp post as this symbol of um potentially yeah as i said

8:37

surveillance um uh in that way i had also in reading this in a book um that i had

8:44

been reading about this called disenchanted night which is about sort of the industrialization of um light um

8:50

i had come across this political cartoon um that was created during the french revolution where

8:56

there are these sort of anthropo anthropomorphized um lamp posts that are pursuing a french general um

9:03

and so the idea that the then this lamppost which is the you know the symbol of the asean regime

9:10

is like then overturned by the people and taken to its own source i thought was a really

9:15

um interesting image and also just i liked i i was just really drawn to these um these lampposts that were like

9:21

wearing boots and had these sort of faces um that imagery so i kind of brought that in this

9:27

work um i brought that together so the image some of the imagery of these sort of blue legs that appear

9:32

in the video work um incorporated into this um imagery from

9:38

that that source that political cartoon and then that political cartoon is also um featured on screen in the film at one

9:44

point as well um yeah so i’m just gonna advance a

9:49

little bit so we can have a look at what the video looks like in the space um

9:57

so you in your introduction you you spoke a little bit about kind of your interest in in horror um and like horror tropes

10:06

um i wonder if you could talk a little bit about that that interest um if you could maybe

10:12

expand on that a little bit yeah i think this stems from uh the project that i did

10:18

just before this one which was called fall fell felt which was a work um which was largely using a lot of

10:24

appropriate imagery from fail videos and specifically the genre of girl fails and so

10:31

um i became kind of interested in applying some ideas from feminist film critique um to these sort

10:38

of internet-based um internet sources and specifically this genre so thinking about sort of

10:44

feminist readings of film where the idea that um female bodies are often

10:50

ones that are used to transmit um these sort of somatic responses these really intense physical responses

10:57

so um in that work i think there is a uh even though it’s taking these kind of

11:03

humorous videos there is like an element of horror there and um in screening the work at one

11:09

point um in a large auditorium of students um actually at concordia

11:14

um i had there was a moment when there was like a moment of suspense and something happened and

11:20

someone in the audience like very loudly gasped and i just thought it was so amazing to have such like a

11:26

like audible tangible like sort of response and just thinking about that and thinking about

11:31

horror as um a genre that elicits these like very um bodily responses sometimes where

11:39

you’re physically like jolted but also thinking about that as a way of like um

11:45

horror is like a genre where you really get immersed in it and caught up in those emotions and reactions but

11:51

often as soon as you have one you immediately kind of get um bumped out of the experience and you sort of realize that you’re a body

11:57

sitting in a chair in a theater or in front of your computer so like those two types of awarenesses of something

12:03

that i’ve been interested for a while in my work i think um of kind of breaking the illusion of the

12:08

screen so then um yeah i think from that i knew that i wanted to kind of explore this

12:13

genre more yeah i think it’s really interesting in that um in the fell feld felt video

12:21

um the thing that i thought was like so jarring about that is like so it’s a

12:28

collection of found um footage um of fail videos

12:33

but you you always like cut right before like the actual

12:39

fail so right before somebody falls or like does whatever and and i think it’s something that’s

12:46

that you also kind of play with in this video as well and it’s

12:52

it is definitely something that’s employed a lot in horror where you kind of cut right

12:57

before and there’s just like something about it that makes it so much more

13:04

visceral than actually you know seeing the fall and then you kind of laugh i think it’s something

13:10

that like turns it very like quickly and very easily from like humor into horror

13:19

in those videos and in your previous work as well um you’re often using found footage

13:27

but this one you’re actually using your own body um

13:34

i’m not sure so have you have you used yourself as a an actor in previous videos and i

13:40

guess maybe like how what was that like in in kind of using your

13:46

your own body to kind of investigate this a little bit more um it has been an element in my

13:52

previous i would say two projects that i have been interacting with the found footage and it has been myself

13:59

um who has been who has been the actor in those works as well um but this is the first work in a very

14:06

long time that i’ve made that does not incorporate found footage well i suppose there is like a

14:11

when like the hammer hit this hits the screen that hammer is actually taken from a youtube video but that’s the only moment that’s sort of like under a second of

14:18

footage so um that was something that i from the last work i kind of knew

14:23

i i think as time had gone on i for a few years i was working exclusively with found footage

14:29

and so gradually i’ve been injecting more original footage often of myself into the work um and then

14:36

i kind of knew that for this work to sort of almost as a challenge to myself and also just to create new ways of working i

14:41

decided i didn’t really want to work that way for this piece um so so yeah i guess i have been

14:48

working with myself in the footage and in a lot of ways i think um partially that’s due to a fact of

14:54

just like when i make my works i make them like by myself like i don’t i that’s the way i prefer to work is

15:01

sort of not even though film and video often like uh requires

15:06

collaboration um so uh but i kind of like to do it on my in my own way because i also think that

15:12

i work in a way of like i don’t really know what i’m doing i’m just always kind of like experimenting and trying different

15:17

things and to think about trying to direct someone else i don’t really know how that would work um but also just uh i think

15:24

conceptually in the works that i’m often kind of like invest like investigating like a hypothesis so like

15:32

i had a work called how to chop an onion where i was sort of trying to think about how we learn things online

15:37

from instructional videos et cetera so like the process of me enacting those things or repeating those

15:42

gestures was sort of like testing how that happens in in a very loose way um and the same with the last project

15:49

where i was sort of interested in how or why videos have failed like fail videos

15:55

are so captivating and why they have such a physical effect on us and it was sort of like testing that effect on

16:01

myself in some ways um in this work i’m not you know i’m not sure if that applies quite as much

16:07

because there’s a lot more narrative here than has been in my previous works um

16:13

yeah um [Music] yeah also um i just wanted to take a

16:20

moment to remind our audience that if they have any questions for you that they can go ahead and add them into the

16:25

chat um at any time um so i’m just gonna advance a little bit

16:32

um so there are a few um kind of recurring

16:38

visual elements in the film um so i’m just wondering if you could maybe

16:44

talk about them a little bit um how you chose them and what you hope that those elements achieve and while

16:51

you’re talking i might just click through the images um yeah so i think i in my head or in my

16:59

organizing of the the pseudo like not really script of this but the shot list as i organized this work

17:05

i did develo sort of divide it into chapters um and partially that was an organizing

17:11

prince like um way of working for me because this work um just by its nature had to unfold in a

17:18

very different way than i normally work because i normally work primarily in video and i do a lot of just visual experiments um

17:26

you know creating a lot of imagery um but working in film i knew i had to have um a bit more of a script and a plan and

17:32

i also kind of in knowing that i wanted to work more with narrative um i knew that um i wanted to i might have to sort of

17:40

script this out a bit more so i kind of started by just collecting a bunch of images that i wanted to include

17:46

in the film in a document and then just sort of ended up grouping them around these themes

17:51

um thinking about like one i think would be like mirror or glass like surfaces and thinking

17:57

about how all of these things kind of relate to screens so the screen is a reflective surface it’s also sort of a gla like a window that you look

18:05

through um and then also thinking about there’s a one um segment that i associate more with

18:12

like the candle flame smoke light um in that way so thinking about the these

18:18

devices as like i said sort of light sources um and then a third chapter which is more like um

18:25

i think it’s like it’s not it’s a little bit not as neat like maybe it’s like water

18:30

and like the curtain slash window um and just thinking about maybe the screen as this sort of like

18:37

it’s like a it feels like a permeable um layer or surface that we can kind of

18:43

like see through and traverse into um although of course that’s an illusion but um uh

18:50

yeah so i think it was kind of like once i had all of these images that i knew i wanted to work with it was kind of like just a matter of

18:56

like figuring out how to organize them and so these themes were something i was thinking about and just thinking about once again the idea

19:02

of the screen as being like um yeah the guiding principle here and just thinking about

19:08

all the different meanings of that word screen and how it can be something that you project something on to or something that is a boundary

19:15

between like indoor and outdoor or different types of spaces so um yeah so i think that’s i guess what to

19:21

say and then there’s some other sort of imagery of like the lock also that sort of appears and that’s kind of like ideas once again of yeah

19:27

boundaries and um different interior now to exterior space um private and public space and those

19:34

kind of ideas come up with the curtain as well so yeah long-winded answer sorry [Laughter]

19:41

that’s what we’re here for um do you have a question uh uh from the

19:48

chat so you did just mention your kind of interest in in narrative or loose in a narrative and they’re

19:54

wondering if you can say a little bit more about narrative in this work uh was there a story or a hint of one

20:00

for you in the planning stage of this work um uh hi tamara nice to see you i wish i

20:07

could see you but nice nice to see your name there um uh yeah i think um well i there were it’s i guess it

20:14

began with just a no a desire to work with narrative which i haven’t as i said before i think in my

20:19

previous work one kind of emerged in the process um and it just made me realize i wanted to work with it um

20:25

but it was a challenge for me to kind of think in that way um so i guess there was a hint of one just in the sense of as soon as i kind

20:32

of decided that i wanted to use these two different formats 16 millimeter film and then actually

20:37

it’s 4k video so thinking about the differences of those two formats i sort of like i said began to think of them

20:43

almost as two characters and so whether one is like the protagonist and one is the antagonist or

20:48

the villain or whatever i don’t know and they’re kind of the same person ultimately but um thinking about it in that way um

20:56

was one way i started to think about it and then i knew it would kind of work in these cycles of day and night that would become

21:02

potentially increasingly confusing although i’m i think maybe they’re just confusing from the outset at this point

21:08

um but yeah so i knew that was also like going to be set up on these cycles of day and night

21:13

that are become more and more confused so that was the basically the hint of narrative that

21:18

i began with could you um expand a little bit more on

21:25

like like how the film is made and a little bit more maybe like the technical side of like using

21:32

the 60 millimeter and 4k and the different kind of filming tactics that you were using

21:39

um yeah so i think um the desire to use film for this project

21:45

i hadn’t used like 16 millimeter film since i had very first begun working with moving images

21:51

um so it’d been quite a long time um and i think i was just sort of interested in how um

21:59

these two mediums capture light so very differently um and how one thing i was thinking

22:05

about was specifically that 16 millimeter film you know it’s balanced for tungsten and daylight um

22:11

and so these like screens you know the whole idea of blue light of why it is kind of confusing for us

22:16

is that it mimics daylight but it’s not daylight so i kind of wanted to see how 60 millimeter film would respond um

22:24

to that sort of light source um so that was maybe a beginning point with knowing

22:30

that i wanted to work with that um and just thinking about um

22:35

how i would like yeah work with these two different vantage points often like filming the same thing with

22:41

both cameras um and combining the footage um in the same frame often because masking it’s kind of like

22:48

something that appears and collage type work appears in my work um very often so i knew that would probably come back

22:54

so wanting to sort of have these two different looks in the work but then also combine them at certain times just to

23:00

um talk about those two perspectives and i guess you know i um for me i’m really interested in how

23:06

um whatever image capturing technology we have um becomes so much a part of well i

23:14

think really influences the way we see the world like it shifts how we act in the world it’s just how we um

23:21

present ourselves you know like thinking about like um i remember like when hd

23:28

video first appeared on the market like there was all like a new lines of makeup appeared that were specifically like

23:34

targeted for hd resolution and then also i think you know with instagram and filters and like things like that like

23:40

the way that we actually um shape how we appear in the

23:45

world based on image making technologies and also how our collective sort of memory of a time

23:50

exists based on how those appear so i was thinking about all those things

23:55

and working on with the film so i was shooting in tandem the film footage and the video footage

24:01

so technically i was shooting those like in the same day you know sometimes um and uh like i said for me it was a

24:09

big adjustment because i’m very used to working um like where i’ll shoot a little bit of video and then i do a lot of sort of

24:16

um work with effects so i usually shoot a little bit play around with it and then gather more as needed but with film

24:22

obviously i had to work on a different timeline and um basically do a bunch of shooting before

24:27

i started the editing process so that was a big difference um and then i guess i would just say lastly like uh

24:34

that i think another reason that i found the film footage to be interesting to work with was because and sort of like

24:40

i i really have enjoyed working with found found images um in many ways because of the limitations

24:47

that it that gives me i think with video like you know when i’m shooting original footage i can just reshoot and shoot and

24:53

get so much footage um that it’s hard to know when to stop and i i’ve always like appreciated like found footage for um yeah the

25:01

limits it presents and what it might present that i wouldn’t have expected and a lot of ways i’ve started creating

25:06

my own footage in the same way where i’m often end up using shots that were just like um

25:12

they weren’t intended to be in in the final work but then i kind of appropriate them as if they were found footage and with film the same way not

25:18

knowing exactly what i was going to get i felt like i had that limitation um which i find to be like productive

25:27

um so

25:32

[Music] um so leslie sharp is asking

25:39

um so she’s interested in the other light that’s in the film which i think you were talking about a little bit as she she

25:45

put this question up um she says the film light the natural light that gets disrupted and

25:51

infiltrated especially since film is another early technology were you specifically

25:57

interested in how those work together um and did oh no i don’t know this book

26:04

and so i think i’m gonna butcher this name so and she’s asking did the shavel bush

26:11

influence that um well i’m i think i’m not sure if i totally

26:18

understand but thank you leslie so much um i think um

26:23

like thinking about how the film light and the natural light that gets disrupted and infiltrated i mean i think i was sort of

26:29

think you know in some ways i also in a maybe sort of simplistic way thought about like um the the film as the more like

26:39

um naturalistic element like you know a lot of film buffs will still

26:44

argue that film is a more um it captures light in a more true way than digital video i mean

26:51

i’m sure there are many perspectives on that but sort of thinking of that as being like um more tied to actual daylight

26:58

um when we’re seeing that um and so that that sense that it’s often being infiltrated by the blue light which is

27:05

definitely true is happening time and time again and i just was thinking about sort of like

27:10

that idea that like i don’t know when we’re constantly in front of screens it’s really i mean i

27:15

feel like it just ends up like no matter where we are that light is is present it comes with us wherever

27:21

we go um you know it’s it’s like literally on our bodies like at all times with our

27:27

phones maybe not on um but often is so just thinking about how it sort of bleeds into that and so

27:33

also just how our experiences or um what we see online ends up leading into what we see

27:39

like in the the real world in in the outer world um so i think i hope that answers your

27:45

question let’s not let me know um and i would say that the chiva bush book that i referenced earlier and i think

27:50

you actually did read this as well lindsay that’s the um one on the industrialization of light so just thinking about um

27:57

uh i actually read that kind of in the second half of my research so i was just kind of thinking about more

28:03

about that sort of yeah the that maybe came later but so i i guess i would say from the beginning i was sort

28:08

of interested in always having these two types of light merging and blending specifically having the blue

28:14

light kind of seeping into the more like 16 millimeter film light if that makes sense

28:22

um nicole is asking about this soundtrack which i’m also super

28:28

interested in because this is one of the the last elements that you you added and

28:33

so you and i have not really even talked a lot about um the soundtrack so um she’s wondering

28:39

uh the inspiration for the soundtrack uh and she also has a second question um

28:45

she’s also wondering if you’re if you experience any challenges filming a year a year apart and half in

28:52

new brunswick and half in edmonton great um thank you um

28:58

so the soundtrack yeah it was sort of the last element um and um it was collaboratively

29:05

collaboratively i couldn’t even say the word collaboration i was gonna say i don’t normally work collaboratively um before the

29:12

soundtrack i worked with my partner who’s also an artist um and uh obviously there’s a lot of

29:19

quotation happening um with uh based

29:26

soundtracks for um horror film um obviously there’s a lot of yeah

29:31

association with that jump with that genre um and so i knew i kind of wanted to go

29:36

in that way but i was also really concerned about it becoming too much of a parody or too

29:43

much um too nostalgic i guess were my concerns

29:48

um but i think that there’s also such an interesting history of how filmmakers and directors have worked

29:54

with synthesizers because they are so low budget and often directors themselves can kind of score

29:59

films because because of the accessibility of um synthesized soundtracks and also just

30:05

the importance of the soundtrack in in horror film as often like that’s a way to communicate a perspective of

30:11

either the the monster or the the slasher or communicate the perspective of

30:17

um the victim or protagonist so it adds so much to the texture of the

30:22

work and the the the way that you can kind of have such a large soundscape um existing

30:29

um with that um was sort of where i wanted to approach it i mean i

30:34

guess like i said it’s obviously there’s going to be a lot of quotation there and i was concerned about that a lot in the work but

30:40

eventually i just i just sort of embraced it i guess um uh but yeah and i think another

30:47

reason i would say is that i i don’t also normally work with like a musical score um for my works

30:54

um but in the way that i think this work plays a lot with like immersing you in it and then kind of

31:01

like um you know panning back and you realize that you’re seeing something different or you’re kind of

31:06

like the illusion is broken so i wanted to use like a a musical score to kind of work

31:12

like to draw you in and then also like create that rupture um yeah so i guess i guess that

31:18

hopefully that answers it and then thinking about the um the filming a year apart um yeah i

31:23

definitely did post some challenges i think just thinking about the the the landscape um

31:30

i know brunswick does factor in quite largely into the work um so then kind of transposing it um

31:37

here in edmonton was a challenge although i was doing a lot of sort of reshoots filling things in um more like detail shots and um i think

31:44

it also just posed a challenge because mentally like where we were where we all were in the summer of 2020 was a very

31:51

different place than we were in the summer of 2019 so i think thinking about that was i mean that was a challenge also just thinking

31:57

about approaching a project from in such a different headspace um but yeah so i think i mean

32:04

i guess it did pose challenges but um because of the types of things that i was shooting

32:09

i i was i you know in the my not huge concern with maintaining a whole lot of like like breaking the consistency was

32:17

okay with me um and i was able to use the same model of camera so

32:22

um that sort of visual consistency was still there but i think it also shifted the work in a way that um that i think was um beneficial to the

32:30

work in the end so yeah thanks um you just mentioned a little bit of this

32:36

you know kind of like this panning back um i think it’s like an interesting element um

32:42

in the film of this you know you’re constantly like tricked into like not quite knowing what

32:48

you’re you’re looking at and or not quite knowing like how many screens you’re looking through at any

32:54

any given time um can you talk a little bit more about that

33:00

kind of like trickery i guess in in the film yeah and i think i guess

33:06

that’s maybe something that’s been consistently an interest in my work like i think that

33:12

like the surface of the screen is something that in past works as well i’m always kind of

33:17

interested in breaking apart sort of rupturing that surface and playing with it like thinking about

33:23

it once again as i was talking about with those sort of metaphorical like themes that appear in the work is something that’s like a space

33:29

that that feels like it’s um that we can traverse and and go into but then ultimately is

33:35

just like a flat surface and then always kind of reminding i guess the viewer of that

33:40

but playing with that has been something that i’m always um always really interested in in thinking

33:45

about um and then also just i think you know distraction is a big part of

33:52

our lives right now especially but um something that i was thinking about with the work as well and just

33:57

so often you’re kind of being drawn into something and then all of a sudden you know a window like a computer a browser

34:03

window rather closes or something shifts all of a sudden and you’re it’s kind of like

34:08

hard you get distracted um and you know just sort of thinking about that and um another of the the books that was

34:16

kind of influential early on in the research for this project was um jonathan carrey’s book 24 7 and he kind

34:21

of talks about how like um being an uninterrupted spectator is like completely outmoded that

34:27

every time we’re looking at something we’re constantly like clicking to go forward or clicking to skip the ad or reviewing it or rating it or like

34:34

there’s some interaction involved and this idea of like being completely immersed as a spectator

34:40

for a long period of time is something that um it’s very hard to achieve now and so

34:46

sort of thinking about that in the work as well is sort of like um yeah all those things

34:53

so was there some some motivation in wanting a full screening of the film so you could yes exactly

35:01

[Applause] yeah exactly because i know myself but right now it’s really hard to sit down

35:07

and like well i’m in front of a screen all day for for every for everything um for work for for

35:14

studio practice for um uh friendships you know for everything so

35:21

um i think it’s really hard to dedicate time a block of time so yeah i guess i i i

35:28

you know i can imagine having the best of intentions to sit down and watch a 15-minute film but it might be very hard so thank you all

35:33

for everyone for being here today and watching so yeah yeah thanks for everybody’s attention um

35:41

yeah i mean i guess you you touched just briefly on you know the pandemic that kind of

35:48

changed your way of working and how you were actually able to produce the film

35:54

um but i wonder if it’s if it’s changed how you think about it um the imagery

36:01

that you were using in it i i think it it’s interesting that you know these these themes of kind of

36:08

having your life mediated through screens and being kind of always

36:14

at the mercy of this blue light was definitely relevant before the pandemic but now i think it’s

36:21

kind of like tenfold yeah exactly exactly and i think um yeah so i mean

36:30

i guess i guess maybe it has shifted in some ways i mean i think a lot of the ideas were already in the work

36:36

but as you’re saying that maybe the experience has been amplified a bit in in the past

36:43

uh 12 months so um i think also that i think one thing that i wanted to work

36:49

with in the film was just feeling like this feeling of sort of disorientation that comes from

36:54

um being exposed to your screen for an extended period of

37:00

time and just sort of this disorientation of time and place and time of day etc but also just thinking

37:06

about how um [Music] uh like i think i was recently listening

37:12

to something on i think the cbc or about how memory is even being shifted in this pandemic because it’s really hard to kind of grasp

37:18

time when every day kind of feels the same um and you sort of can’t remember if something happened

37:24

like a day ago or like three weeks ago because it all kind of like that sort of blurry sense of time

37:30

and disorientation of distinguishing markers of time is something that i’ve been thinking about a lot lately which i i hope that

37:37

the work kind of like maybe captures in some ways um yeah well and i

37:42

think even just like this image that we’re looking at here of like the the strawberries and they kind of like

37:48

evaporate into smoke or kind of go bad before your eyes but but yeah i think it’s definitely like

37:54

i’ve i’ve lost all sense of the timeline no idea um then

38:02

anything was yeah exactly actually now that we’re on this image like the the strawberries they do

38:08

show up um like a few times kind of repeatedly um did you want to expand a little bit

38:15

on on that sure i mean i think this is something that came out of like the in the editing process like i was

38:22

shooting them when i was on residency um and not knowing sort of how they fit into

38:27

anything and then this works specifically like what what you’re seeing is um a shot

38:33

from on 16 millimeter film um that was shot of this bowl of strawberry sitting on this chair and then i had re-shot

38:40

um the bowl the same bowl of strawberries um with like intense blue lights with the video camera

38:46

from a slightly different angle and then um transpose that on top of it so you’re

38:51

sort of seeing this video image that you can kind of see like there’s a more harsh sort of glare

38:56

on the strawberries the reflection in that portion of it so collapsing those two images together um

39:03

and so um yeah i think this was something that i just sort of was shot a few times with the 60 millimeter film and with the

39:10

video it’s kind of like a test subject in a lot of ways it was something i just had around in the um in the apartment where i was

39:16

staying so it’s sort of um i just had this footage but i really i really liked the footage and i knew i

39:22

wanted to include it so it kind of happens at um uh what i think of as these sort of

39:28

different chapters so as as we move from one to another the strawberries reappear so they appear here there’s one time

39:34

where you sort of see them reflected in the the phone itself and then another time at the end where the strawberries are

39:40

being chopped so it’s sort of like they just sort of signal the shift i guess um which is maybe not perceptible

39:45

to anyone but me but that was like how i perceived them in the work

39:52

um yeah we have a couple of questions um related to um

40:00

are there art historical quotations um in the work in particular

40:08

um like the mingling of of screens and and still life

40:14

um maybe uh uh willem calf in this dangling orange peel um or maybe

40:21

a duchamp in the leg um the the only

40:29

direct sort of quotation i guess i would say um of another artwork i think is the leg

40:35

but i i was actually thinking of um one of my favorite films um syntagma by valley export um where

40:42

there’s a sequence in the work where um there is um uh an actress um who is on a bed and she’s

40:50

sort of interacting with these images of herself so it’s like an image of her arm and then she places and then

40:55

there’s a like a photo print of an arm and then the actress like lays her arm beside it and they interact in this way

41:01

um that’s really compelling and i i love that work so um i was kind of thinking

41:06

about this that work and and so instead i have it like it’s in front of a t i have the image of my leg on the tv

41:13

and then my actual leg sort of steps in to sort of interact with it um that part has been shot on film and

41:19

so just it’s just thinking about the interaction of like the body and the image um that’s so such a big part i guess of

41:26

my work in a lot of ways um so that was that’s kind of an like a nod there as far as like other

41:34

like i mean certainly to the genre of still life there are some some nods but i wasn’t thinking of any specific works

41:40

with those um i just kind of that was one of the images that i knew um

41:48

early on that i wanted to have like i just knew that i wanted to have a film shot of the still life that would gradually

41:54

the objects would be replaced by the video footage of the same stuff so the blue sort of lit

41:59

video imagery would sort of overtake that still life and that was just something that i knew i wanted

42:04

in there from sort of the beginning of working on the project

42:11

yeah maybe you can can you talk a little bit about this kind of like layering of smoke i know

42:17

that you spoke just a little bit about um kind of like the smoke is more like a broader

42:23

element um but if you could talk maybe about this like juxtaposition of like this

42:28

smoking hand with the forest um sure and i guess actually i this will

42:34

contradict what i just said because i was like i only have one direct quotation um but i

42:39

so this shot kind of began from um the many of the many horror films that i

42:45

watched and kind of thinking about this project um i think it was a dario argento film

42:50

um deep red where there’s like a shot of someone smoking in front of a of of of a tv with like a newscaster and

42:58

the the hand is sort of in soft focus and you see what’s on the tv and i just visually i was really

43:03

compelled by that image so um i kind of wanted to bring that in somehow that type of framing um and so

43:11

um it’s sort of the footage has been replaced by this this imagery of forest fires um very

43:17

devastating forest fires and just the way the the the smoke commingles

43:23

from both sources you know i was just sort of thinking about like one one thing i guess uh you know

43:31

also sort of themes that run through my work but thinking about um when we’re when we’re just kind of inundated with imagery like this

43:37

um that’s that’s just so devastating and horrifying and just but not really being able to respond or

43:43

act or understand is how i feel often where it’s like the more the more imagery i have of it the less i

43:50

kind of know how to how to comprehend it in some ways um so like this sort of like the the smoke

43:58

from a joint sort of mixing with that is like the the best way to like understand it and sort of like the way

44:04

these two things sort of blur together um and obviously there’s like kind of a like a a sense of like

44:10

um escapism also that’s happening and just sort of like i think

44:15

the way that in this sequence then the smoke sort of follows the camera and continues is

44:20

um sort of thinking again more about like how um what we experience on the screen

44:27

ends up sort of leaking into our daily lives um so like you know like i said in collapsing in

44:33

some ways so i guess that was another thought there um but yeah this is essentially just a shot taken in front of my laptop screen

44:40

um just to explain that a little bit more yeah um so taryn is curious about the blue

44:47

droplets can you talk a little bit about what material they are and is this the

44:54

blue light becoming uh material or matter um i like that idea the idea of like the

45:02

blue light becoming material and i guess in some ways it is um um i mean literally it’s just sort of like

45:10

drops of like blue food coloring that i green screened out and laid over the image

45:15

um i think it was just kind of once again that i like it multiple ways of thinking about it

45:21

kind of like um i think i already used the term leaking but once again with that

45:26

those droplets it’s sort of really making that really material so that idea that like the the blue light is actually just like

45:32

dripping onto these other surfaces and and um it’s not really bleeding through because it’s dropping onto them as a

45:38

surface but um just how it kind of starts to um

45:44

bleed onto um the other image or the other experience um so thinking about it in that way i

45:50

guess um and i think formally it’s just like something that i’m like i said very interested in

45:55

always playing with that idea of like surfaces and and and breaking or

46:01

or revealing that surface more so um yeah hopefully that answers the question but i i i think that’s a

46:08

really interesting way of saying it thinking about is like becoming becoming an actual substance

46:15

yeah and there’s like a relation here to you with like this image and kind of like how you’re playing with this in a couple instances as well

46:24

um i might just go back to um i’m sorry this

46:31

a little bit my clicker is a little bit slow um yeah just to kind of draw everybody’s

46:38

attention to this um so this is the the political um cartoon that you were talking about

46:45

in the the beginning that comes from that um that uh book that then has the

46:51

the light in the back um was there anything else that you wanted to kind of

46:56

expand on with the lamp post um i mean

47:04

i think i think i said most of it i mean i think um in a maybe what i

47:12

didn’t say in like once again maybe this is more simplistic reading i’m just like thinking about

47:17

you know when i saw this originally i was like it’s it’s liked being embodied as as a sort of figure um which is what

47:24

drew me to it because at that point that was where like i said i this was that was like a

47:29

part of this work that had sort of um been um i knew that that was where this work was

47:36

gonna go from the beginning so um i think there was also just like a pleasure in seeing that and thinking

47:41

about using that in the imagery of the work or pulling that in somehow

47:47

just became a an interest um yeah well i think we’re

47:55

we’re just a few minutes past our hour um and it doesn’t seem to be

48:03

any more questions in the chat for you um is there anything else that you

48:08

wanted to share about the the video before we

48:14

kind of wrap up um nothing off the top of my head um

48:19

if anybody wants to email me questions my emails on my website if anything

48:24

comes up um uh but thank you so much for all the questions that was it went it flew by for me so thank you

48:31

so much and also as i said i know that um everyone’s spending a lot of time on the

48:36

screen so thanks for dedicating a bit more time uh to spend with us yeah and thanks so much for for sharing

48:44

for kind of like allowing us to share the whole video in its entirety it’s really really great um to be able

48:50

to do that while the gallery is is closed um hopefully fingers crossed

48:56

that um things will get a little bit better um maybe our vaccine rates will

49:04

catch up to our uh current numbers that will allow us to reopen um and everybody will be able

49:12

to come and see i think the installation is is um really beautiful um and you should be be

49:19

very proud i think it the exhibition looks really fantastic um so yeah thanks

49:25

thanks for your time this evening and thanks for the work um and thanks everybody for joining us

49:31

yeah thanks so much bye bye

No results found