[Gridflow-dev] alternate syntax for put_at
matju at artengine.ca
Fri Oct 3 15:53:33 EDT 2008
"put_at ( $1 $2 $3 )" may also be written "put_at $1 $2 $3" now.
this is to avoid creating list atoms, because they can't be handled
properly in terms of memory allocation, as pd doesn't allow it.
this could be expanded to all attributes in the future, but this is the
single special case that I needed most, else it's a memory leak.
what do you think of this?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
More information about the Gridflow-dev