[Gridflow-dev] feature requests: @fold1, @foldr, @foldr1, @scan1. @scanr, @scanr1, unary ignore

[Tom Schouten]

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:45:12PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Tom Schouten wrote:
> 
> > How do you see the idea of making pf support a compile time option of
> > gridflow? Libpdp is a system library independent of pd so this should
> > pose no problems.
> 
> This is ok with me.

perfect.

> You just need to add a Feature.new {} block in
> ./configure. Maybe I should make a directory called optional/ for modules
> like this, because that doesn't belong in base/ for sure, and it doesn't
> belong in format/ because that dir is for [#in]/[#out] plugins.
> 

yeah, by all means no hard dependencies. i'm not done breaking everything yet :)

maybe it's best i look at the list import/export objects as an example?


> > That is, as long it is possible to do this outside of gridflow core
> > with a pd object depending on both gridflow and libpdp, but i'm not
> > sure about this actually.
> 
> GridFlow doesn't have a public interface yet. I don't think this will
> happen before 1.0 because I'm still changing a bunch of things. Actually I
> think that this will be the big feature of 1.0.
>

ok. so i do it internally. pf will probably change a bit before i
declare it stable 0.14 so it's easier to maintain that way.