[Lab] Drone hits airplane

[Ken McKinnon]

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/28/heathrow_drone_strike/

yep.  There is a number of articles about the danger in the US being 
well overblown, that birds are still the major problem.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/16/faa_exaggerates_drone_strikes_against_aircraft/

That said, drones are still being used for nefarious purposes....just 
one more tool in the box.  Please, please let some sanity prevail!

Ken



On 2016-04-28 1:02 PM, Darcy Whyte wrote:
> Yes, drones are the new Sasquatch.
>
>
>
> --
> Darcy Whyte
>
> Art+ inventorArtist.com <http://inventorartist.com/> | Aviation 
> rubber-power.com <http://rubber-power.com/>
> Contact: darcy at inventorArtist.com <mailto:darcy at inventorArtist.com> | 
> 613-563-3634 <tel:613-563-3634> by appointment (no text)
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tom Burns <tom.i.burns at gmail.com 
> <mailto:tom.i.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Drone believed to have hit British Airways flight 'may have been a
>     plastic bag'
>
>     http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/21/drone-believed-to-have-hit-british-airways-flight-may-have-been/
>
>
>     A more interesting thing someone noted on twitter is that people
>     are now going to always call an unidentified object a "drone"
>     until proven otherwise. A bit of a reverse Hanlon's razor effect -
>     assuming a malicious third party is acting intentionally.
>
>
>     On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Darcy Whyte
>     <darcy at inventorartist.com <mailto:darcy at inventorartist.com>> wrote:
>
>         I'm not convinced it was a drone strike.
>
>         I'm supposing there will be more evidence. Perhaps a photo of
>         the aircraft damage... until then I'd chalk it up to just a
>         report but not an actual incident..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         Darcy Whyte
>
>         Art+ inventorArtist.com <http://inventorartist.com/> |
>         Aviation rubber-power.com <http://rubber-power.com/>
>         Contact: darcy at inventorArtist.com
>         <mailto:darcy at inventorArtist.com> | 613-563-3634
>         <tel:613-563-3634> by appointment (no text)
>
>
>         On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Jason Cobill
>         <jason.cobill at gmail.com <mailto:jason.cobill at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>                No damage, but the extreme unlikeliness of putting a
>             drone in exactly the right place for a plane strike makes
>             me think it was on purpose.
>
>             https://youtu.be/N3V7IpM7PGc
>
>
>                -Jason Cobill
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Lab mailing list
>             1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
>             2. then email Lab at artengine.ca <mailto:Lab at artengine.ca>
>             to send your message to the list
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Lab mailing list
>         1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
>         2. then email Lab at artengine.ca <mailto:Lab at artengine.ca> to
>         send your message to the list
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lab mailing list
> 1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
> 2. then email Lab at artengine.ca to send your message to the list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artengine.ca/pipermail/lab/attachments/20160428/a607d2c6/attachment.html>