[Lab] Drone hits airplane

[Tom Burns]

Drone believed to have hit British Airways flight 'may have been a plastic
bag'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/21/drone-believed-to-have-hit-british-airways-flight-may-have-been/

A more interesting thing someone noted on twitter is that people are now
going to always call an unidentified object a "drone" until proven
otherwise.  A bit of a reverse Hanlon's razor effect - assuming a malicious
third party is acting intentionally.


On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Darcy Whyte <darcy at inventorartist.com>
wrote:

> I'm not convinced it was a drone strike.
>
> I'm supposing there will be more evidence. Perhaps a photo of the aircraft
> damage... until then I'd chalk it up to just a report but not an actual
> incident..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Darcy Whyte
>
> Art+ inventorArtist.com <http://inventorartist.com/> | Aviation
> rubber-power.com
> Contact: darcy at inventorArtist.com | 613-563-3634 by appointment (no text)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Jason Cobill <jason.cobill at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>    No damage, but the extreme unlikeliness of putting a drone in exactly
>> the right place for a plane strike makes me think it was on purpose.
>>
>>    https://youtu.be/N3V7IpM7PGc
>>
>>
>>    -Jason Cobill
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lab mailing list
>> 1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
>> 2. then email Lab at artengine.ca to send your message to the list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lab mailing list
> 1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
> 2. then email Lab at artengine.ca to send your message to the list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artengine.ca/pipermail/lab/attachments/20160428/d5f38490/attachment.html>