[Lab] AGM

Mon Oct 20 02:05:04 EDT 2014

Ryan,

I am quite aware of the distinction of Artengine and Modlab. My comments
are about artengine.

My issue is there has not been genuine and significant engagement of the
inner artengine group with the member community.

Whatever bylaw structure Artengine has had is all news to me. The first
document I ever received was just before the recent AGM. Well there is the
attached waiver but frankly I saw that as just sudden-new rules/terms for
members vs. information about the organization, bylaws and so forth.
Especially since it was served with a warning of loss of use of the member
resources if it were not sighed before the sudden due date...

I'm not convinced the AGM is a genuine opportunity to contribute aside from
signing up (which didn't apply this year). It hasn't been in the past.

I'm just noticing another email you sent to me to address the unanswered
questions I referred to around 10:40p. I've just skimmed it so far but
you've not addressed the unanswered questions I was referring to. Just
comments on my additional questions I posed after my comment of answered
questions.

I'd love to see the planning documents that were used to obtain government
funding. Please send those.

--
Darcy Whyte

Art+ inventorArtist.com <http://inventorartist.com/> | Aviation
rubber-power.com
Contact: darcy at inventorArtist.com | 613-563-3634 by appointment (no text)

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Ryan Stec <ryanstec at artengine.ca> wrote:

> Hi Darcy,
>
> To follow up on a few points that may help clarify things for yourself and
> others on the list. This is a brief overview of the system of governance of
> the organization. As I stated in the previous response there are other ways
> to interact, but below is the formal framework.
>
> Artengine is a non-profit member-based organization. Membership (up until
> now) has been based on who pays their member dues, a very simple and open
> concept. Members have a primary say in the operations of the organization.
> The Annual General Meeting is for Members (you cannot attend if you have
> not paid) to come together check the financials, meet the board members and
> all the staff, give feedback and have the opportunity to provide direct
> input to any major changes in high level policy.
>
> This is different from a community. We have a Mod Lab community. There are
> artists outside of that. There are audiences. There are Artlist
> subscribers. All different over-lapping communities.
>
> You can characterize membership as exclusive, but all membership is
> exclusive by definition. All organizations need functional boundaries
> otherwise they risk stretching themselves into meaninglessness. This is the
> same with communities. We can say that everyone is welcome, and this may be
> true, but a community does not include everyone. They have functional
> limits, geographic ones, ones defined by interest or otherwise.
>
> This membership structure (like the one we have) is very wide spread in
> cultural organizations and non-profits of all kind in Canada. It is,
> however, in need of updating, much like everyone else, and through the new
> Canada Corporations Act, and so all non-profits in the country have been
> looking at their By-Law structure.
>
> Keeping in mind that this is the formal structure at the heart of
> Artengine, to which you where mostly aware of, I hope I can make the
> following point very clear:
>
> By choosing not to attend the Annual General Meeting (never mind the
> active encouragement of others not to attend) you forfeited your principal
> avenue for participation in the operations of Artengine. As a member you
> received all of the documents that where to be reviewed at the AGM and were
> aware of the important discussion of the meeting, but choose not to
> participate in the formal opportunity available to you. We invited you to
> the discussion, and you decided not to join us. This kind of communal
> project is not only about voicing an opinion. It is also about
> participation and responsibility.
>
> Finally, we will, of course, take your criticism into consideration.
> Communication can be improved. Transparency can also be improved. We are
> working on this.
>
> On a personal note Darcy, I have been involved with Artengine for a long
> time and have put alot of myself into this organization, largely because I
> think both its community and its output are important. It is unfortunate to
> be categorized as a faceless controller. I am happy to continue talking
> about all of this, Artengine and more, in this public forum, but only if it
> is given the kind of care that face-to-face interaction is given. We
> provide this forum for constructive communication and we hope that extends
> from working and helping each other on projects to how you approach and
> interact with the organization itself.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ryan Stec
> Artistic Director
> Artengine
>
>
>
> ___________________________
>
> Ryan Stec
> Artistic Director
> Artengine
> 2 Daly Ave.        Ottawa, ON
> K1N 6E2          613.686.1941
>
> Ottawa Mini-Maker Faire
> Co-presented with The CMST and Artengine
> August 16th and 17th
> http://makerfaireottawa.ca
>
> ------
>
> Read the Driving Creativity Blog at artengine.ca/blog
>
> Follow us on Twitter @artengine
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Darcy Whyte <darcy at siteware.com> wrote:
>
>> Your note is appreciated. My questions aren't answered though.
>>
>> Yes, it was awkward (but necessary) to meet with people on the AGM night.
>> There were people who are not in the invited group and other outsiders.
>> People that didn't want to attend and kicked out people. It's the law (in
>> terms of retaining legal status) known to some but not to most. And it's
>> not the law for non members, the general public and people that were just
>> attending modlab. I knew my meeting would receive poop though. I'm
>> interested in the wide community not just an inner group that controls a
>> specific resource.
>>
>> I realize there are possible improvements to the *official *way to be a
>> member of the community that is artengine (and mattering). Needing
>> improvement is never a fault in itself.
>>
>> Does the controlling group want "members" to know what's going on and
>> have their input?
>>
>> If so it's easy (regardless of legal structure). If there's some activity
>> that includes both members and controlling group then it might be natural
>> (activity among members is good, ways of members discovering each other).
>> AGM might not be a good example since it represents a small amount of time
>> each year and not a real time for dialogue (outside of telling what's up).
>> If it was called the MGM that'd be different. But nobody's invited to that.
>>
>> Some members (I'm assuming they are members since they say or think they
>> are) tell me they would not recognize numerous of the people in the
>> controlling group. This worth thinking about.
>>
>> On that note, at the moment it's hard to know if your a member. I
>> personally think I might be. On one hand my membership has expired. On the
>> other hand, I heard a rumor that the membership was status quo till the end
>> of the year. Will there be communication on this? Surely I'm not the only
>> member (or expired member) that missed the meeting. Or am I?
>>
>> A disconnect. Is this a fail of genuine interest (by the controlling
>> group) or just some logistical, complicated business oogabooga?
>>
>> I understand private clubs and business and family businesses. I had some
>> hope this was more of a communal project. That's more the issue here. But
>> don't trivialize this as an expectation thing. Funds are given with some
>> communal expectation right?
>>
>> By they way, don't think for a moment I think artengine doesn't do good.
>> It clearly does. But I feel let down on wanting to be a member of your
>> community and not just being a subscriber to service that comes and goes
>> based on someone else's interest/convenience.
>>
>> Also don't think for a moment that I have not used obvious channels like
>> talking to people in the organization to be involved in the usual way one
>> would. Most of encounters were "resolved' by
>>
>> -not answering my questions,
>> -some assertion that there are two sides, "members" and the organization
>> (one makes decisions the other hears about them)
>> -or asking for a some softness based on profound incompetence (Hanlon's
>> Razor).
>>
>> Darcy
>> subscriber
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Darcy Whyte
>>
>> Software Since '88 siteware.com | Contact: darcy at siteware.com |
>> 613-563-3634 by appointment
>>
>> Canada N 45° 25'03.1" W 75° 42'21.4"
>> Art+ inventorArtist.com <http://inventorartist.com/> | Aviation
>> rubber-power.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ryan Stec <ryanstec at artengine.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Darcy,
>>>
>>> In response to your questions.
>>>
>>> All paid members where invited to the AGM, if you where a member in good
>>> standing you where invited.
>>>
>>> In our old system paying for service is tied to membership. This was one
>>> of the reasons we offered reduced memberships at the AGM to encourage
>>> members to participate in governance. Membership is also one of the key
>>> legal structures of the organization. You must be a member to exercise your
>>> vote in matters of legal importance to the organization, principally the
>>> election of the board but other major changes to the bylaws.
>>>
>>> Your point that if people don't know about stuff it's not a good tool is
>>> inductive also of how the membership structure as it stood was not a good
>>> tool for development of the organization. We are working to make tools for
>>> Artengine that work.
>>>
>>> The reality that as an active member you choose to suggest another
>>> meeting, while the AGM was occurring, rather than encouraging participation
>>> in the process seems also telling of a need for change.
>>>
>>> One of the important points we raised at the meeting last night is that
>>> this is only one small aspect of how people participate in the direction
>>> and operation of the organization. There are a number of other ways
>>> including volunteering, casual conversation, discussions on this list,  and
>>> even just plain use of the space.
>>>
>>> We hope the new membership will offer deeper engagement with the
>>> organization and with each other. Thanks for those who participated in the
>>> process and we look forward to speaking with everyone about how to continue
>>> to improve Artengine.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Ryan Stec
>>> Artistic Director
>>> Artengine
>>> ---------
>>> Sent from a mobile device.
>>>
>>> I'm glad the meeting was a success.
>>>
>>> Dave wasn't invited to the AGM. If people don't know about stuff then
>>> it's
>>> not a good tool. Was the AGM announced outside of sending invites out to
>>> a
>>> private list?
>>>
>>> That's good to know that there's a 5 percent rule. Has that been in play
>>> for the past years?
>>>
>>> How may members are there? Nobody really knows who is a member. The
>>> member
>>> list athttp://artengine.ca/community/members-en.php doesn't seem to be a
>>> good reflection of membership. Or is it?
>>>
>>> To know if there are 5% of members interested in something the members
>>> need
>>> to be able to find each other.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lab mailing list
>>> 1. subscribe http://artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/lab
>>> 2. then email Lab at artengine.ca to send your message to the list
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artengine.ca/pipermail/lab/attachments/20141020/fde68740/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WaiverofLiability 2013-2014.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 51410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://artengine.ca/pipermail/lab/attachments/20141020/fde68740/attachment-0001.pdf>